Zombie Democracy – Apartheid Fort NZ

5,500 Foreigners Violently Killed & 35,000 Seriously Injured by NZ Tourism Machination since 2000 — Welcome to the World's Deadliest Tourist Attraction: The Final Destination!

Posts Tagged ‘EVIL JUDGES’

pakeha of the Month: Shane Conrad Heal

Posted by te2ataria on February 12, 2011

F**king evil judge of the month: Allan Roberts

Shane Conrad Heal raped and bashed a pregnant woman

The victim suffered enormous  pain, mental health problems and loss of weight as a result of the rape.

And all the f**king evil judge Allan Roberts sentenced the rapist to was only a six-year, 10-month jail term. He declined a non-parole period.

Related Links:

Posted in Corrupt Judges, corrupt NZ judges, judicial corruption in New Zealand, New Zealand | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Police Cleared in Murder of Briton, Lee Jane Mettam

Posted by te2ataria on April 15, 2010

Remember the Murder of British Drug Addict Lee Jane Mettam by a New Zealand Paramilitary Death Squad?

Mettam was a down and out addict. She was desperate, and was carrying an airgun.

It Took a Full Squad of  Scumbag Paramilitary Police Force in New Zealand to Shoot Briton, Lee Jane Mettam, 37. She was shot in the chest several times, even though she couldn’t have harmed a fly.

THE SCENE: A woman was repeatedly shot by police at the First Mobile Vodafone shop in Reyburn St, Whangarei 23 Oct 2008. Photo: WHANGAREI LEADER. Image may be subject to copyright.

A trigger-happy police scumbag fatally shot a Briton Lee Jane Mettam, 37, of Onerahi, Whangarei, who was carrying an airgun. The police assassin, of course, could have shot the “armed and dangerous woman” in the leg or arm to incapacitate her; however, the scumbag deliberately shot the victim in the chest and let her lay on the ground bleeding for several hours so that there would be no chance of her surviving the assassination.

The Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) has cleared the unnamed police murderer,  “Officer A”,  saying he was justified in shooting Lee Meetam.

“In light of the immediate threat of death or grievous bodily harm to himself and others, and he could not have reasonably protected himself or others in a less violent manner in the circumstances,” the IPCA kangaroo inquiry said.

A message to the Authority Chair, the Evil Justice Lowell Goddard, who said other options such as using a police dog or Taser were not available or impracticable:

The moderators sincerely wish something as bad, or worse, would happen to you or someone very close to you, one day soon!

Related Links:

Posted in 10 Police Questions, IPCA, Justice Lowell Goddard, Killed in New Zealand, murdered by police | Tagged: , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Cost of Raping a ‘Colored’ Girl in New Zealand

Posted by te2ataria on January 22, 2010

sent by a reader in Auckland [edited by TEAA]

Another District Court Judge F**ks Up Again!

Lawyers’ fees + $5,000 (if the victim is an Indian or a Pakistani)

Graeme Stuart Redmond,  A Kirwee farmer, couldn’t keep his farming tool in his trousers, but managed to find the right lawyer.

Graeme raped a 15-year-old member of the minority community, believed to be an Indian or a Pakistani girl, got himself a “good” lawyer, wrote an apology letter to the girl, offered $5000 emotional harm reparation and was sentenced to eight months home detention by the evil judge.

Who was the Defence counsel? It was  Jonathon Eaton QC,  of course. The lawyer who specializes in looking after the old boys after they rape a minor.

“He said the incident was an example of a gross act by an intoxicated man with ill judgment. He realised it was wrong and stopped, then apologised to the girl the next morning.”

[“Hey, he apologized, didn’t he? And the girl must have enjoyed it, too. She was just a darkie, and must be grateful for the fun, and the money.”]

What did the Crown prosecutor say? “Redmond could have had no reasonable idea that the act was consensual,” or words to that effect.

Who was the Crown Prosecutor? They could have placed a vibrating sex aid with the batteries running out in the courtroom instead, and no one would have noticed the difference.

The *&^%$#@ Judge

Christchurch District Court Judge David Saunders reportedly said that he had “accepted Redmond’s remorse and generous offer of reparation, and it was evident he had support from the people in court,” NZPA said.

Uh… so next time all rapists should ask members of their extended family and school friends, too, to attend the court. Right?

“He said Redmond, who held official positions in the local community, had good references, and this was an isolated incident from a man with good character.”

[“In short he was one of the good old boys! And the victim just an Indian girl who couldn’t make her mind up, no doubt. She might have even asked for it”.]

“Earlier in the sentencing Judge Saunders spoke directly to the girl’s father and encouraged him and the family to attend a restorative justice meeting.”

The judge then revealed that the family was considering leaving New Zealand [and returning to their country of origin.]

That’s one way for apartheid New Zealanders to repatriate “colored” immigrants.

No name suppression in this case, because Jonathon Eaton QC didn’t think it was necessary to hide the identity of a kiwi HERO!

Related Links:

Posted in Christchurch District Court, Graeme Stuart Redmond, Jonathon Eaton QC, Judge David Saunders, name suppression | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 6 Comments »

Another Judge F**ks Up, Again

Posted by te2ataria on November 30, 2009

sent by a reader [edited by TEAA]

Sex with a Minor is [Statutory] Rape!

It is an offence in New Zealand to have a sexual connection with a person under the age of 16: NZ Crimes Act (1961) Part 7, section 134 [See below]

The Case: “A personal meltdown” after a 38-year-old’s long marriage broke down, according to the Christchurch Court News website, a report said.

The Rapist: David Michael Johnson (Property developer)

The *&^%$#@ Judge: Judge Colin Doherty

Defence Counsel: Jonathan Eaton

Crown Prosecutor: [They could have placed a vibrating sex aid with the batteries running out in the courtroom instead, and no one would have noticed the difference. ]

The Charges: Judge Doherty described the charges as “an eclectic collection of sexual connection methods.”

The pre-sentence report: The Rapist “did not accept responsibility and blamed the victim.”

The Victim:  Judging by the sentence handed down, readers may infer that the 15-yo victim was a “worthless” and “unimportant piece of dirt” who happened to be a “good f**k.”

Impact on the victim: “She now suffered from serious emotional harm. She had dropped out of school, was unable to concentrate, and had recurrent bad dreams.”

The victim believes that Johnson, the rapist, targeted her for having sex, which she later described as “rough and demeaning.”

Sentence: The evil Judge “reduced Johnson’s sentence for his guilty pleas, his apology, and the emotional harm payment. This brought it within the range where home detention could be allowed, but he said it was ‘a close run thing.'”

Then the *&^%$#@ judge “balanced” his decision by  imposing “special conditions”  on the nine-month house detention term, and lifting the name suppression (!)

What if the victim was a member of the bast*rd Judge’s own family? Would he have still gone out of his way to protect the rapist?

Home Detention for Statutory Rape? What part of the Law didn’t you understand?

New Zealand Legislation: ACTS

Crimes Act 1961 No 43 (as at 17 October 2009), Public Act

134 Sexual conduct with young person under 16

(1) Every one who has sexual connection with a young person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.

(2) Every one who attempts to have sexual connection with a young person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.

(3) Every one who does an indecent act on a young person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years.

(4) No person can be convicted of a charge under this section if he or she was married to the young person concerned at the time of the sexual connection or indecent act concerned.

(5) The young person in respect of whom an offence against this section was committed cannot be charged as a party to the offence if the person who committed the offence was of or over the age of 16 years when the offence was committed.

(6) In this section,—

    • (a) young person means a person under the age of 16 years; and
    • (b) doing an indecent act on a young person includes indecently assaulting the young person.
      Section 134: substituted, on 20 May 2005, by section 7 of the Crimes Amendment Act 2005 (2005 No 41).

Related Links:

Posted in Claire Boshier, Police State, sex offence, Statutory Rape, victim impact | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Censorship in New Zealand?

Posted by te2ataria on November 13, 2009

sent by a reader [Edited by TEAA]

So What’s New?

When a corrupt justice system disallows a father to grieve

Under instructions from the scumbag Justice Judith Potter, police forced the father of murder victim Sophie Elliott (she was stabbed 216 times) to read a heavily censored version of his victim impact statement to her killer in court.

Gil Elliott
Gil Elliott, the murder victim’s father. Photo: Sharron Bennett/ Nzh. image may be subject to copyright.

“Gil Elliott has revealed police gave him a statement with entire sections crossed out with a marker pen at the judge’s request the night before Clayton Weatherston’s sentencing.” NZHerald said.

“Gil Elliott has revealed police gave him a statement with entire sections crossed out with a marker pen at the judge’s request the night before Clayton Weatherston’s sentencing.”

Mr Elliott is understandably angry about the censorship because, he says, “most of what was taken out was innocuous in a legal sense but very important to Sophie’s family.”

Sophie Elliott
Sophie Elliott was stabbed 216 times.

A law-abiding citizen, he didn’t want to be held in contempt by just ignoring the censorship and reading the statement, anyway.

He says the statement, on which he had worked for 18 months,  didn’t contain any personal abuse nor any hint as to what sentence the murderer Weatherston should get.

“Mr Elliott was particularly disappointed he could not address some of Weatherston’s claims during the trial, particularly that Sophie attacked him first with scissors.” The report said.

“They were lies. I wanted Clayton to hear that from my mouth. I wanted his mother to hear that. I wanted the media to hear it – but they would not let me say it.” Mr Elliot said.

The Murder Weapon

murder weapon
The scumbag New Zealander, Clayton Weatherston (inset), used the knife (pictured) to  kill Sophie Elliott last year – Exhibit No.2 in the High Court at Christchurch. Photo: DEAN KOZANIC/The Press. Photo may be subject to copyright.

But that’s the whole point. If Gil Elliott was allowed to challenge the murderer’s lies, which the prosecution clearly failed to do, it would have looked even more ridiculous, leaving the evil judge without a single excuse for passing only an 18- year sentence on one of their own for the frenzied murder.

The Murderer  (another scumbag kiwi elite)

Clayton Robert Weatherston
Top pakeha scumbag. Former Otago University tutor Clayton Robert Weatherston. Weatherston was ordered to stand trial after a depositions hearing midway through last year at which 17 witnesses gave evidence. Photo: CHRIS SULLIVAN/Fairfax. Image may be subject to copyright.

“How dare Clayton Weatherston think he had the right to kill Sophie and deprive us of her future, watching her grow and mature into her chosen career. And maybe have a loving relationship with someone who respected her for who she was, not someone who could abuse and manipulate her for their own ends.” One of the passages which the evil judge censored from the impact statement read by Sophie Elliott’s father Gil at the murderer’s sentencing.

Only 18 years for 216 stabs? That’s right the evil murderer receives less than 31 days for each fatal stab wound he delivered to the victim.

The most troublesome aspect of this sham trial and fools’ sentencing charade is that the murderer would be out in less than 6 years!

Related Links:

Posted in Censorship in New Zealand, corrupt justice system, Killed in New Zealand, Murdered in New Zealand, New Zealand, Tourist Deathtrap | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »