A Personal Message to Judge Eddie Paul
Posted by te2ataria on November 7, 2009
sent by an outraged NZer [edited by TEAA]
You’re a lowlife slimebag and a disgrace even by NZ judges’ standard
Judge Pimp discharged a sex offender without conviction
Judge Eddie Paul, aka Judge Pimp, let a prominent entertainer walk free after he had admitted performing an indecent act to a teenage girl.
He also granted a permanent name suppression to his fellow ratbag.
The offender had pleaded guilty to the charge of performing an indecent act with intent to insult [ejaculate?] during an incident in Wellington in March, 2009.
Passing sentence in Auckland District Court Lavatory, Judge Pimp said, “the charge was not a trivial one and carried a maximum penalty of two years in prison,” as if describing the event in detail and letting a fellow scumbag off the hook gave him sexual gratification, too.
“However, he said the detrimental consequences of a conviction in this case would result in an extreme situation out of all proportion to the gravity of the offending, which he rated as moderate to low. [What about the future victims?]
“A conviction would damage the man’s career and harm his international prospects by restricting his ability to travel overseas, especially at short notice.
“Judge Paul also said allowing the man’s identity to be made public would defeat the discharge he had granted.
Judge Pimp said allowing the man’s identity to be revealed would defeat the discharge he had granted.
Judge Paul, in summing up the facts, said the defendant, who had been drinking, was in Courtenay Place about 3.30am on March 5 when two females recognised him.
They approached him and asked to kiss him on the cheek.
He let them do that and then told them to “kiss my balls”, the judge said.
The two females ignored the comment, but they walked hand in hand with the man to an alleyway, where he undid his trousers, pulled out his penis and repeated the request.
The two females, who were embarrassed, said nothing.
He grabbed [the 16-year-old girl] by the head, which he pulled to his crotch and she felt his penis touch her left check.
She objected, pulled away and heard the man laughing as she left.
In deciding on the sentence, Judge Paul said he took into account the man’s early guilty plea, the remorse was shown in letters he wrote to the victim and his lack of previous convictions.
The judge said the offence had appeared to be spontaneous rather than premeditated, and occurred after the defendant had been approached by the victim’s friends.
The behaviour had also seemed to be out of character for the man.
The defense counsel Ron Mansfield had sought a discharge without conviction and permanent name suppression, and got 100 percent of what he asked for.
To all potential rapists and sex offenders, if you are unlucky enough to get caught for the serious crime of rape or other heinous sexual offenses, you know who to go to. That’s if you can afford the defense counsel Ron Mansfield’s fees. Better still, join the same “elite scumbags” group that Mansfield, Judge Pimp, and the sex offender belong to.
Rape Crisis, a rape victims support group, wants the famous entertainer to be held accountable.
The group’s Education Director Kim McGregor was quoted as saying that someone who commits such a sexual act needs to be watched by the community, or at least undergo a sex offender treatment programme. She said the entertainer’s attitudes towards young women obviously need to change, and without a sanction there is nothing to stop him offending again.
IF ANYONE KNOWS THE IDENTITY OF THE SCUMBAG, THIS BLOG WOULD PUBLISH IT. TEAA
Related Links:
- Child Rape: An Inseparable Part of the Police State
- New Zealand synonymous with child porn and bestiality
- New Zealand: The Ideal Sanctuary for pedophiles
Zombie Democracy - Apartheid Fort NZ 
Trevor said
[Edited! Since you had nothing intelligent to say… Moderator]
te2ataria said
Teen victim slams musician’s name suppression
By JONATHAN MARSHALL – Sunday News
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sunday-star-times/news/3085484/Teen-victim-slams-musicians-name-suppression
THE TEENAGE girl attacked by a prominent entertainer has broken her silence, describing the musician as a “disgusting, self-righteous pig”.
And Brittany Cancian’s mother has also spoken out, saying the musician’s permanent name suppression was “totally disgusting”.
Brittany, 17, was in central Wellington on March 5 when two of her friends were led away with the drunk man around 3.30am. Brittany’s mother Racheal, of Lower Hutt, said her daughter was attacked by the man while she was checking on her friends.
“I think he’s an animal, when I heard what he had done I thought it was animalistic. He wasn’t at all gentle about it,” Racheal said.
“What happened has absolutely been downplayed. She never followed him down the alleyway. She went to see that her friends, who had followed him, were OK. She has quite a caring heart and she wanted to check on her mates. When she went around the corner he grabbed her.”
Earlier this month the Auckland District Court heard how the famous entertainer asked Brittany and her friends to “kiss my balls” before he grabbed the teenager’s head and pulled it towards his crotch. His genitals brushed Brittany’s face.
The man admitted a charge of inducing an indecent act but was discharged without conviction and given permanent name suppression on the grounds that naming him would affect his record and concert ticket sales. The charge carried a maximum jail term of two years.
The musician was ordered to pay $5000 reparation to Brittany, who is yet to receive the money.
Racheal said police never asked her or Brittany if they wanted the man’s name suppression application opposed. Court documents reveal police maintained a “neutral” position on the matter.
“As a mother I am disgusted that he could get name suppression and I’m disgusted that he could do this to my daughter.”
Brittany said in a statement that the entertainer should have been named so other females could be “wary” of him.
Brittany and her mother’s comments come just days after the Law Commission released a report recommending an overhaul of New Zealand’s name suppression system to make it harder for offenders to keep their names secret.
Commission president Sir Geoffrey Palmer said if recommendations in the report had been adopted by the government prior to the musician’s court appearance, he “certainly would not” have received suppression.
“He would have to show extreme hardship and that is very difficult to do … that is hardship out of the ordinary, not ordinary hardship, and that is a much higher threshold than the law currently provides.”
“We all have to have equality before the law. The person who is a grave-digger has to be treated the same as a person who is an All Black.”
[Note: Frigging grave-diggers are bottom of the pile on this *&!^% Commission president’s list!]
Asked whether families’ views on suppression should be taken into account, Justice Minister Simon Power said: “The issue of name suppression needs a very broad overhaul and I’m not closed to any suggestions.”
Racheal was reluctant to discuss why her daughter, aged 16 at the time, was out in central Wellington during the early morning.
“I don’t really want to go into that part but, yeah, she was quite naughty.”
The entertainer last week said he was “too busy” to be interviewed and had “no wish to discuss” the incident.
© 2009 Fairfax New Zealand Limited
sarah said
http://forums.punkas.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1109947&sid=b97d0ed1255ea78803dd1d0932b48586
this site has the name. he looks like moby.
te2ataria said
The blog moderator has now visited the above forum and seen the NZ Herald article copied under the title: “P Money allowed to keep name suppression.” However, this blog is UNABLE to VERIFY or REFUTE any information about the case, unless the victim writes in.
JohnKey PM of NZ says he knows who the criminal is. Since this information is hardly state secret and unlikely to damage state security, the readers are advised to email the PM and ask him to share his information, confidentially of course!
You can email Key on
john.key@national.org.nz or
j.key@ministers.govt.nz
Johnnmac said
What’s the guys name? Anyone know or can give a clue???
te2ataria said
We have a fair idea, but don’t like to give the wrong dog a bad name, if mistaken!
Johnnmac said
I’d put any amount of ‘money’ on it I know who it is…
te2ataria said
kiwi Males Believe in Birthright to BJ on Demand
Bob (the lover of his auntie) said
[Your message was inadvertently deleted. Will post if same content resubmitted, despite your incestuous name. Moderator]
RA RA RA said
= P + MONKEY – K
3_CMBx` said
OMG !! WAS IT HIM !!
OMG ! ! WHAT THE HELL !! THATS SOME CRAZY STUFF !! HAHAHAHAHHAA
WOOOW …
I CANT BELIEVE IT !! HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHH
AWWWWW HOW COULD YOU BROO
Jeff said
So is it P-money?
te2ataria said
We won’t confirm or deny any rumors. But if the victim(s), or anyone else with verifiable information, contact us with the details, we’d publish her/their comments in the interest of public safety [the convict is a sex manic and a danger to kids, teens and women of all ages,] and worry about going to prison later.
te2ataria said
Musician Name Suppression: SG Backs Corrupt Judge
Lyn said
Who cares if HE did it.. no one should get away with that behaviour no matter their star status, plus it sounds like we have all guessed who it is anyway and we really didnt expect it to be anyone else did we??? So whatever.. and he isnt famous for being innocent is he??? Rappers usually have some bad streak attached…Thats if we are on the money with who we think it is.. if not stop us guessing and tell us who the sicko is…
te2ataria said
Your objective should be to press the corrupt govt / justice system to release the name of the sex offender, who is a threat to all of us. You could start by emailing the dysfunctional PM demanding to know the sex maniac’s name:
john.key@national.org.nz or
j.key@ministers.govt.nz
Lyn said
Thanks will do, just cant believe what people get away with, i have experienced this abuse myself and no one ever gets caught. why dont police think rape is a bad thing to suffer through. It stays with you forever. would like to know what they would do if it was them or their child….
Laws are there for the guilty not the innocent/ victims
te2ataria said
My heart goes with you, and I agree with what you are saying about the “Laws are there for the guilty not the innocent/ victims” 100 percent.
If you’re looking for answers regarding the application of the laws in this country, the following might help:
“Rape is a torture routine, a weapon of mind control and subjugation used by the establishment to repress ordinary people in this country.” — Dr R.
Here’s a link to another blog you might find relevant to the issue:
Your input is always welcome!
Broken Prince said
Philip Grobler said
Did I miss something?
Get me out of this place said
New Zealand judges, to the extent I have had exposure to them, remind me altogether of Al Swearengen, the bordello owner in “Deadwood” –
“God rest the souls of that poor family… and p***y’s half price for the next 15 minutes”.
Mandy said
Any recommendations or advice?
[No, just suck’em and see! Moderator N.]
Zimmer said
A Personal Message to Judge Eddie Paul: We know what scumbag you are!